LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Roma IT
Personal Data:Male, born: August 23 1962
HomePage or other cool site:http://https://www.facebook.com/GiovanniGugliantini
Membership23years 189days ago.
Last Login20days 17h ago.
Last Move20days 17h ago.
gugliandalf is currently Offline!Send a mail to gugliandalf


Message header
Area/Game:General
Topic:General
Subject:Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
Posted by: gugliandalf - 22years 255days ago.
Message text
The disadvantage of this approach is tha a scenario has to be played a lot of times before we have a significant statistic. Meanwhile, stats will be affected by "wrong" ratings, and that will repeat for every new scenario.

I guess an Aircraft Rate (ACELO) would do a better work. From start, it can be computed simply by the aircraft stats: Nr. of moves, hit points, fuel, stability etc (I'll try to do it).

(Hope following tables are rendered correctly)

E.g. let's take our Gold-vs-Copper:

Player Score Wins Loses

Gold 1600 +10 -50
Copper 1200 +50 -10

Now immagine Gold's plane is worth 25, and Copper's one is worth 50 (1/2). So Gold's score is doubled and Copper's is halved:

Player Score Wins Loses

Gold 1600 +20 -25
Copper 1200 +25 -20

Or the other way round (2/1):

Player Score Wins Loses

Gold 1600 +5 -100
Copper 1200 +100 -5


As anybody can see, a good pilot on a bad plane still gets some score, while a good pilot on a good plane gets even less than "normal" ELO.

Normally, "rookie fishers" play in one-on-good (them) against many-on-bad (rookies). This way, with ACELO, is even less rewarding. Especially facing the perspective of loosing a lot of points due to a rookie's lucky shot.

Another gues, yet to be verified, is that rokkie fishing happens in "standard" games, without special damage. It makes sense, as it eliminates the chances of lucky shots. So another good idea, IMO, would be to have different stats for simplified, standard and advanced games. Probably, "hard" gamers will snob simplified and standard stats, leaving fishermen to their misery.

Remember: the only real damage fishermen do is to unbalance stats. On another POW, their "hard way" teaching on rookies is even commendable.

Another (IMO better) idea would be simply to record in stats only advanced games. Simplifiend and standard are for greenhorns!

It is IMO mandatory, anyway, to keep different stats for different games (simplified, standard and advanced). IMHO they are in all effects different games.

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

22years 259days marcuza Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 259days flying_neko Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 259days Swartz Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 259days Falconfab Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
 22years 259days morgh Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
 22years 257days Swartz Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
 22years 257days Swartz Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 257days duke68 Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 257days gugliandalf Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
 22years 257days warrax Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
 22years 256days Leandro Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
 22years 255days Haerpec Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
  22years 255days gugliandalf Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 256days Falconfab Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 256days marcuza Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 256days Falconfab Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 256days gugliandalf Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
 22years 256days gugliandalf Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
 22years 255days Falconfab Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
  22years 255days gugliandalf Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
   22years 254days Falconfab Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
    22years 254days gugliandalf Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
 22years 255days Falconfab Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
  22years 255days gugliandalf Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 256days gugliandalf Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 255days Moonbarker Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 256days Crash and Burn Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 255days gugliandalf Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 255days tomski Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 255days kaesar Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
22years 255days andrematty Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
 22years 255days Falconfab Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
  22years 255days andrematty Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
   22years 254days Falconfab Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
    22years 254days Swartz Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
     22years 254days gugliandalf Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
      22years 254days Falconfab Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
      22years 254days flying_neko Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
      22years 254days gugliandalf Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
      22years 254days Swartz Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
       22years 254days marcuza Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
       22years 254days gugliandalf Re: many compliments to DragoonHK
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

22years 249days flying_neko welcome back!!!
22years 249days flying_neko Re: welcome back!!!
 22years 249days ivanhawk Re: welcome back!!!
  22years 249days Ensign Re: welcome back!!!
22years 249days PaoloL Re: welcome back!!!
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

22years 255days flying_neko Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
22years 255days flying_neko Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
22years 255days tomski Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
22years 255days flying_neko Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
22years 254days Falconfab Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
22years 255days gugliandalf Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
 22years 255days gugliandalf Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
  22years 254days Leandro Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
   22years 254days Falconfab Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
   22years 254days gugliandalf Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
    22years 254days Leandro Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
     22years 254days flying_neko Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
      22years 254days gugliandalf Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
      22years 254days Leandro Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
       22years 254days flying_neko Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
        22years 254days Leandro Re: Is lots of fuel an advantage after all?
Page generated in: 20.3125 milliseconds.