Message text Zif wrote:
Well, you have a lot of reason for your idea, Guglia.
^____^
I have to say that your last objections made me reconsider it under a different light. The base idea sounds good, but it should added something like a "random landing terrain table", spoiling its simplicity.
I just downloaded red Baron 3D upgrades and patches, for it
More info? Maybe by mail?
Anyway my opposition (sorry if it was so strong ) is due even because I generally don't like to insert a new rule o strongly modify the originals.
I always loved to modify games rules. I think the only game I left as it is was AH's "Waterloo", my first boardgame. :°)
That's because some or a lot players maybe wont like that change.
Of course. I always considered it to be an optional rule.
I am agree too that double fuel is not a rule that increment accuracy, it just give some more chances to Fokker and low fueled planes, but it was a "boxed" opional rule, we always applied it when we play.
And I think it is easy to implement, too. I think I'll settle for that while Blue Max is complete. Then we coluld possibly start talking about an "Advanced Blue Max". 
This discussion is very interesting, but I think we should wait 'till the Skymasters have had (?) enough time to implement special damages, observers and maybe altitude rules.
That goes without question. But talk is cheap. 
have fun |
|
|
Donate
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
