YouPlayIt!YouPlayIt!LOGIN or Register 
LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
HomeYour GamesYour ProfileForumGames CreditsLinks DonateFAQ
Leagues
League IndexHow to PlayLeagues People PlayStatistics
Gonzaga
Play GonzagaNew!How to PlayGames People PlayStatistics
Blue Max
Play Blue MaxHow to PlayPlanes & Combat chartsScenarios ListGames People PlayStatisticsTactical AdviceThe Big Planes Race
Cartagena
Play CartagenaHow to PlayGames People PlayStatistics
Wooden Ships...
Play Wooden Ships...How to PlayGames People PlayStatisticsNewbies' guide
King Me!
Play King Me!How to PlayGames People PlayStatistics
VampiRing
Play VampiRingHow to PlayGames People PlayStatistics
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Roma IT
Personal Data:Male, born: August 23 1962
HomePage or other cool site:http://https://www.facebook.com/GiovanniGugliantini
Membership23years 186days ago.
Last Login17days 12h ago.
Last Move17days 12h ago.
gugliandalf is currently Offline!Send a mail to gugliandalf

Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Scenarios
Subject:Re: When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
Posted by: gugliandalf - 21years 162days ago.
Message text
Phil Hall wrote:
I'm pretty sure the Led Zeppelin Camel isn't historical. .

Of course is it! Except that it was a Navy Camel, doing (guess) Zeppelin hunting (from whence the name, actually a short for "leAd (to) zeppelin"). It was flown by Cpt. John Nigel Page, grandfather of a more famous Page.

Some time later he was assigned a wing command on the first Snipes, that he decorated with some odd symbols . They can be found on the 4-vs-4 Snipe-vs-S.S. scenario, and also on the wing leader's nephew fourth album.

There must be some hidden meaning about number four, but I can't guess it right now.

Anyway, I'm doing research about the planes flown by Ltn. George Townsend and Cpt. Archibald Jagger (seems he flew a Bristfit with Sgt. John William Richards on the rear)...

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject
21years 168days Zif [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 168days morsac Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 168days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
 21years 168days Ashtar Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
  21years 168days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
   21years 168days Regis Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
    21years 167days sven3012 Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
     21years 167days juggernaut Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
      21years 167days Regis Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
       21years 167days dr.falko Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
        21years 167days sven3012 Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
         21years 166days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
          21years 166days wetty11 Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
           21years 166days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
           21years 166days dr.falko Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
           21years 166days dr.falko Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
            21years 166days sven3012 Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
             21years 165days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
              21years 165days Hans Johansohn Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
               21years 165days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                21years 165days Phil Hall Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                 21years 165days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                 21years 165days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                 21years 164days webmaster Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                  21years 163days Phil Hall Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                  21years 162days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                  21years 162days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject
21years 162days gugliandalf [BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days imdog Re: [BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days tomski Re: [BM] Is this a record?
 21years 162days imdog Re: [BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days flying_neko Re: [BM] Is this a record?
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject
21years 162days Von Zerow [BM] Holydays
All trademarks or tradenames used in this Web site are the property of their respective owners.
Material may not be republished, nor may content or images be mirrored on another server without written permission.		 
Page generated in: 17.57813 milliseconds.