Play Blue Max boardgame online or challenge other players at different wargames.

Main menu

Home Your Games Your Profile Forum Games Credits Links

Donate FAQ

Leagues

League Index How to Play Leagues People Play Statistics

Gonzaga

Play Gonzaga New!

How to Play Games People Play Statistics

Blue Max

Play Blue Max How to Play Planes & Combat charts Scenarios List Games People Play Statistics Tactical Advice The Big Planes Race

Cartagena

Play Cartagena How to Play Games People Play Statistics

Wooden Ships...

Play Wooden Ships...How to Play Games People Play Statistics Newbies' guide

King Me!

Play King Me!How to Play Games People Play Statistics

VampiRing

Play VampiRing How to Play Games People Play Statistics

Forum Message

Previous message

Post on the new forum

Next message

City:	Torino
Personal Data:	Male,
Membership	22years 256days ago.
Last Login	3years 229days ago.
Last Move	16years 245days ago.
morsac is currently	Send a mail to morsac

Message header

Area/Game:	Blue Max
Topic:	Scenarios
Subject:	Re: When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
Posted by:	morsac - 21years 168days ago.

Message text

Zif wrote:

Maybe someone will hate me for this post.

To the scenario creators, if* it is possible, when normal chits are enough to use them instead new ones ? For example in the scenario Fokker DVII vs Camel. It is not a new that i really hate part of the new plane chits, and since Blue Max got lots of original I'd like to see those, when they are sufficient, instead of new creation, of wich some is really terrible

De gustibus...

here my two cents as author of some new chits (I hope not the terrible ones

, beside my SS D.I, that are really terrible

):
I'd like using chits that reproduce historical aircraft patterns (e.g. marcuza's planes), not only the original BM ones; IMHO, for certain planes (Bristol, S.E.5a) the originals are too similar each other.
However, it's not easy to find colour images of top view WWI planes.

Back to the messages list

Messages thread

Posting elapsed time	Posted by	Subject

21years 169days	Zif	[BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 168days	morsac	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 168days	gugliandalf	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 168days	Ashtar	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 168days	Zif	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 168days	Regis	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 168days	sven3012	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 167days	juggernaut	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 167days	Regis	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 167days	dr.falko	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 167days	sven3012	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 167days	Zif	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 166days	wetty11	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 166days	gugliandalf	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 166days	dr.falko	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 166days	dr.falko	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 166days	sven3012	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 165days	Zif	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 165days	Hans Johansohn	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 165days	Zif	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 165days	Phil Hall	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 165days	Zif	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 165days	gugliandalf	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 164days	webmaster	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 163days	Phil Hall	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 162days	gugliandalf	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 162days	gugliandalf	Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)

Next thread

Posting elapsed time	Posted by	Subject

21years 162days	gugliandalf	[BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days	imdog	Re: [BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days	tomski	Re: [BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days	imdog	Re: [BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days	flying_neko	Re: [BM] Is this a record?

Previous thread

Posting elapsed time	Posted by	Subject

21years 162days	Von Zerow	[BM] Holydays