LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Coventry UK
Personal Data:Male, born: November 23 1975
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.myspace.com/stevo_j
Membership21years 310days ago.
Last Login16years 90days ago.
Last Move16years 111days ago.
sven3012 is currently Offline!Send a mail to sven3012


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Scenarios
Subject:Re: When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
Posted by: sven3012 - 21years 168days ago.
Message text
Regis wrote:
A nice idea, very likely almost impossible to implement, but that would however be somewhat historical, would be to allocate a colour frame to a player's plane according to his name and "fame" (being stats, contributions to BM, etc).



Personalised plane colouring according to stats... If this were possible...
I take it Newbies would start with standard BM colourings and then you could be awarded a new design depending on your average points?

As an example, Gladiatore could have his own "Imperial" design, so that everyone would know at the first sight which plane has to go down first

I have to admit, when I'm in a game with Gladiatore (and a few others!), I do my best to avoid them and rack up some kills elsewhere to avoid dying a nasty death with 5 points on the board!

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

21years 169days Zif [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 168days morsac Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 168days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
 21years 168days Ashtar Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
  21years 168days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
   21years 168days Regis Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
    21years 168days sven3012 Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
     21years 167days juggernaut Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
      21years 167days Regis Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
       21years 167days dr.falko Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
        21years 167days sven3012 Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
         21years 167days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
          21years 166days wetty11 Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
           21years 166days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
           21years 166days dr.falko Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
           21years 166days dr.falko Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
            21years 166days sven3012 Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
             21years 165days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
              21years 165days Hans Johansohn Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
               21years 165days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                21years 165days Phil Hall Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                 21years 165days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                 21years 165days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                 21years 164days webmaster Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                  21years 163days Phil Hall Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                  21years 162days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                  21years 162days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

21years 162days gugliandalf [BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days imdog Re: [BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days tomski Re: [BM] Is this a record?
 21years 162days imdog Re: [BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days flying_neko Re: [BM] Is this a record?
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

21years 162days Von Zerow [BM] Holydays
Page generated in: 17.96875 milliseconds.