LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Chieti IT
Personal Data:Male, born: April 04 1892
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.arabspc.net/upload/images/Nieuport_11_3.jpg
Membership23years 181days ago.
Last Login1year 112days ago.
Last Move4years 5days ago.
Zif is currently Offline!Send a mail to Zif


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Scenarios
Subject:Re: When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
Posted by: Zif - 21years 165days ago.
Message text
Well I think somebody will be disappointed about that.

Somebody got copyright on this game and couldn't like so many changes, expecially if they are going to be "ridicolous" and if they aren't strictly necessary due to software limits.

This is not your personal game, u don't have a right to make your own designs. Unless, i repeat, u don't have enough chits to fill scenarios(and those should be historically accurate too..in my opinion).

Sorry if i'm a rude guy but that's what i think




PS

because of that i left my old idea of insert total new planes, and after all i can undersatand that

--- Message edited by Zif

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

21years 168days Zif [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 168days morsac Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
21years 168days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
 21years 168days Ashtar Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
  21years 168days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
   21years 168days Regis Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
    21years 167days sven3012 Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
     21years 167days juggernaut Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
      21years 167days Regis Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
       21years 167days dr.falko Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
        21years 167days sven3012 Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
         21years 166days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
          21years 166days wetty11 Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
           21years 166days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
           21years 166days dr.falko Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
           21years 166days dr.falko Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
            21years 166days sven3012 Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
             21years 165days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
              21years 165days Hans Johansohn Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
               21years 165days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                21years 165days Phil Hall Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                 21years 165days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                 21years 165days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                 21years 164days webmaster Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                  21years 163days Phil Hall Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                  21years 162days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
                  21years 162days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] When possible, use normal chits instead new (?)
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

21years 162days gugliandalf [BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days imdog Re: [BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days tomski Re: [BM] Is this a record?
 21years 162days imdog Re: [BM] Is this a record?
21years 162days flying_neko Re: [BM] Is this a record?
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

21years 162days Von Zerow [BM] Holydays
Page generated in: 25 milliseconds.