LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Roma IT
Personal Data:born: October 27 1975
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.takeaplay.net/squadcup3/home.html
Membership22years 307days ago.
Last Login14years 313days ago.
Last Move14years 316days ago.
marcuza is currently Offline!Send a mail to marcuza


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Scenarios
Subject:Re: No more Gullivers
Posted by: marcuza - 21years 210days ago.
Message text
ivanhawk wrote:


I think this is a really bad decision for a nnumber of reasons.

1. Blue Max is an unbalnced game in his own nature. Different planes make unbalanced games. Even scenarios involving similar planes are not completely balanced. Those were just a bit more unbalanced. The only really balanced scenario is the one used in Cobra Touornament (SS D.I vs Mieuport 17), which is one of the most boring I have ever played.

2. I gather that the problem is (again) about stats: unbalanced games are a sort of 'point and kill mine' for rookie-bashers. Solution to that? DROP THE STATS. Just don't mind them. Play for the fun, the thrill and the kill, not for numbers. As flying_neko used to say, BLUE MAX IS AN RPG.

3. For me, I don't think this kind of games are so unbalaced as you say. It depends on map size (which is probably the most imposrtant factor) and the skill of the pilot in the 'big' plane. I'm not so sure a Snipe is all that superior to three Dr.I in 8x8 map.The Fokkers have to be quick, but they can wipe the Allied plane out of the sky. You want more balanced games? Drop the large map, not the scenarios. The 17x12 map is the real rookie basher. Or drop standard rules, which make it virtually impossible to shhot a Brisfit or a Snipe down. As Sinead O'Connor once said: fight the real enemy!

4. Two of the scernarios you deleted were proposed by me

CIAO
ivanhawk

FeuerKugel Jagdgeschwader



1. Agree

2. Agree

3. Agree

4. Agree (what?)

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

21years 211days gugliandalf [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 211days imdog Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 210days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 210days Sabelkatten Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 210days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 210days marcuza Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 210days flying_neko Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 210days morsac Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 210days marcuza Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 209days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 210days ivanhawk Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 210days flying_neko Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 210days marcuza Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 210days tomski Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
 21years 209days Ashtar Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 209days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 209days ivanhawk Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 209days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
 21years 209days ivanhawk Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
21years 209days PaoloL Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
 21years 209days imdog Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
 21years 209days ivanhawk Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
  21years 209days imdog Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
   21years 209days Ensign Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
    21years 208days imdog Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
 21years 209days sven3012 Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
  21years 208days Zif Re: [BM][SCE] No more Gullivers
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

21years 207days Capt-Tuttle [BM][BUG] Game 103445
21years 207days flying_neko Re: [BM][BUG] Game 103445
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

21years 208days Regicide Re: [BM][SCE] to create new scenarios
Page generated in: 17.96875 milliseconds.