mjk1964 wrote:
i don't understand why on a multiple plane game if i force a plane to retire when it has more points tha i have i loose the game. i propose that a plane that leaves the game cannot be considered a winner. non capisco perchč se forzo un aereo a ritirarsi e quello aveva pił punti di me e magari ancora carburante,vince lui. propongo che chi si ritira non possa essere considerato vincitore della partita. dite la vostra
You can't say you are the winner just because you remain alone in the sky. There are a lot of reason to retire: fuel, damages, outnumbering situations. It's hard to define when is right to retire and when not (who can blame someone retiring with 2 points left on the tail or alone against three enemies?), moreover German planes usually retire before Allied ones due to fuel limitations.
In any case, points scored are quite meaningless, so you should think before which is the best way to decide who is the winner. Personally, I think that there's no reason in declaring a single winner if you play a team match, maybe you shot down a plane just because you were covered by your wingman (it's an hard job, but someone must do it!)
The only thing you have to care is: "did your enemy retire intentionally to win the game by points?" If the answer is yes, then shame on him here in the forum. Rumors are quite useful to recognize and avoid unfair players.
Marcuza
--- Message edited by marcuza |