I think that strongly unbalanced scenarios should be simply deleted. This can be easily done by the Scenario Masters, but I understand that it's a little hard deleting something you just created

Actually I'm planning to give everyone the possibility to vote the current scenario during every game he's playing. I'd like to hear some proposal about what kind of vote could be better to use.

I mean, a scenario can be unbalanced but very fun to play, or very balanced but boring.
In the same time a scenario can be fun for the allied planes and boring (or simply impossible to win) for the german or viceversa.
We need to know it exactly because the worst scenarios have to be deleted if they'll get a very low overall rating. How much low it should be before deleting is not decided yet. Perhaps there could simply be a vote choice as "please delete this scenario". Any suggestion is welcome.

Currently we are never deleting pending games because sooner or later they always start. Inserting a warning probably we will have to change this behaviour.
A game labelled as "strongly unbalanced and boring" will never start, and will stay in the pending games list forever. It's simply easier to delete that scenario, instead of let it there engulfing the pending game list when someone is trying to use it to easily shoot down other players.

Any comments?
Fourth