LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Baton Rouge US
Personal Data:Male,
Membership20years 273days ago.
Last Login1year 207days ago.
Last Move2years 137days ago.
Templars is currently Offline!Send a mail to Templars


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Rules
Subject:Re: gun used for zero hex shots
Posted by: Templars - 16years 341days ago.
Message text
The way the mechanism of zero hex works, it should be the front gun (in most cases). When you catch someone in the same hex, facing the same direction, but at a lesser speed, you have sort of let your opponent "slip past you", so it's the front gun that shoots.

Now if you stalled and the guy does a 27S2 ending in the opponent facing 180 degrees from your front, then I suppose the back gun would get the zero hex.

In my 4500 games, I've yet to see that.

aces_high wrote:
In the Bristol (or even other 2-seaters), when you have a zero hex shot, which gun is used to calculate the damage? Is it the front or back gun?

Also, if one of the guns is damaged or jammed, does the program revert to using the one "good" gun?

thanks,
aces


--- Message edited by Templars

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 341days aces_high [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
16years 341days Templars Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
 16years 341days aces_high Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
  16years 341days litehoof Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
   16years 340days DarknessEternal Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
   16years 339days warrax Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
   16years 339days Templars Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
    16years 338days litehoof Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 346days BMBug [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 346days FENRIS Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 346days BlackSheep Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 346days TnT Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
 16years 346days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 343days imdog Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 342days Capt-Tuttle Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 341days BlackSheep Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 336days Zarby Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 346days Mongoose [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
16years 345days Mongoose Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
16years 344days Capt-Tuttle Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
 16years 342days Mongoose Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
  16years 339days Mongoose Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
   16years 338days imdog Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
Page generated in: 28.90625 milliseconds.