ksnake wrote:
A player who does not accept tail, of any sort, is foolishly forgoing useful intel.
You have an argument loop:
A tailing loop occurs.
A player who does not accept tail, of any sort, is foolishly forgoing useful intel.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
No players in the game are foolish (according to your definition), so nobody forgoes the tailing information.
The tailing loop remains.
[...]
In this case, I'd rather play with players you define "foolish" than with smart players as you.
  
--- Message edited by flying_neko |
Donate
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
