Templars wrote:
A question - you stated in the rules that depending on the number of pools, you would have to move to the next round some second place finishes. The problem I see is that, how can you determine the best second place finishes, until all the pools are completed? Just a thought.
I sort of thought that perhaps you were now amending things and taking the top two finishes in each pool. That would make sense though, the top 8 finishers in the 8 pools, could have then been lumped into two pools. This way, it seems more of a tournament, that is two from each pool, to qualify for the next 4 pools.
I don't know if I get the point.
anyway, when i started the subscription i didn't know the number we were, so i did't know how many pools will be. this is because i stated that maybe some of the second would be necessary to have a full second round.
as soon as i had the number of players, i could arrange them and have 8 pools.
now, i could take the 8 winner and put them in 2 pools, but then the final would be a 1 vs 1 match.
or, as i do, take the best 2 from each pool, arrange them in 4 pools, and have 4 winner for the final round 
i hope i have put this in a clear way. i have always a lot of problem with my (uggly) english!
anyway, if you check the site, you can see the assignment in round 2 and in round 3.
ciao
francesco aka sbadranga |
Donate
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
