LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

Country:CA
Personal Data:Female, born: November 20 1963
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xy9Sgmth_rc
Membership20years 137days ago.
Last Login12years 332days ago.
Last Move12years 347days ago.
Tornade is currently Offline!Send a mail to Tornade


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Other
Subject:Re: Strange result in type of victory... or not?
Posted by: Tornade - 19years 272days ago.
Message text
litehoof wrote:
Tornade wrote:
Wishgamer wrote:
Regis wrote:
If they retired with honor, then they as still considered as on the map for victory purposes...


Aha!! Ok, thanks Regis, yes they sure did.


assuming the game was a fighter sweep of some sort...so the side that retreated has been swept from the sky...and cannot possibly score a victory of ANY sort

you CANNOT achieve air superiority by shooting down one aircraft and running away...this whole retiring with honour business is just nonsense

Actually, a fighter sweep that kills an enemy and gets away is a win. Combat usually boils down to attrition. Killing an enemy and flying away may not give you superiority that day but over time it will. I guess it all depends on what the immediate objective is.


well my understanding of the objective of a fighter sweep is to clear the opposing force from the sky...so if you fail to do that...then you fail in the mission no matter how many planes you shoot down...
clearing the sky of enemy fighters leave the enemy on the ground vulnerable to the ground attack planes...or the bombers...or the recon aircraft

killing a fighter or two and running away may look good when tallying kills....but wont amount to a hill of beans when the bombers are leveling your industrial centres...unopposed fighters are straffing your airbases...and the ground troops are pushing forward under the air umbrella that was not cleared away

by your thinking Litehoof...the German airforce would have eventually defeated the Allies in World War Two instead of being crushed the way it actually was


Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 272days Wishgamer [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
19years 272days Regis Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
 19years 272days Wishgamer Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
  19years 272days Tornade Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
   19years 272days grtbrt Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
   19years 272days pokerguy Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
   19years 272days litehoof Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
    19years 272days Tornade Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
     19years 271days litehoof Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
     19years 271days ksnake Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
     19years 271days litehoof Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
     19years 271days Tornade Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
      19years 271days Hans Johansohn Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
     19years 271days moonglum01 Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
      19years 271days pokerguy Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
      19years 271days Tornade Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
       19years 270days Regis Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
      19years 271days litehoof Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
       19years 271days Hans Johansohn Re: [BM][OT] Strange result in type of victory... or not?
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 268days Capt-Tuttle [BM][BUG] League 1019
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 272days SkunkGuru [BM][BUG] Got 4 Reds but see 5 cards
19years 272days Wishgamer Re: [BM][BUG] Got 4 Reds but see 5 cards
 19years 272days SkunkGuru Re: [BM][BUG] Got 4 Reds but see 5 cards
  19years 272days litehoof Re: [BM][BUG] Got 4 Reds but see 5 cards
  19years 270days Zarby Re: [BM][BUG] Got 4 Reds but see 5 cards
   19years 270days SkunkGuru Re: [BM][BUG] Got 4 Reds but see 5 cards
Page generated in: 29.6875 milliseconds.