LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Roma IT
Personal Data:Male, born: August 23 1962
HomePage or other cool site:http://https://www.facebook.com/GiovanniGugliantini
Membership23years 190days ago.
Last Login21days 5h ago.
Last Move21days 5h ago.
gugliandalf is currently Offline!Send a mail to gugliandalf


Message header
Area/Game:General
Topic:General
Subject:Re: against new restricted's rules
Posted by: gugliandalf - 23years 50days ago.
Message text
Kollos71 wrote:

However, with planes of this type, it was lucky to pull off a full loop without stalling, even if they did a dive to begin it. Multiple loops would certanly stall or damage the aircraft.
If they continued to barrel roll, the stress would damage or even destroy the aircraft.
We are talking planes and engines that took 9 minutes to climb to their celing. Some planes that the wings would rip off if the dive was to steep.
I do not like the rules. I vote to change them back, however will fly either way.
I also disagree that these rules are realistic.


Well, my only flight experience with theese planes is with fly sims (although quit a lot of them ), and regarding loops i have to say that, except for a few "monkey cliber" like the Dr.1, you are quite right. With rolls, I think one could play a little more, except for altitude loss that, as I said, in BM is ignored.

But here is another point. Why an ace can loop'n'roll as long as he wishes? Has him a special plane or a dispense from laws of physics?

Now, let's pretend that the initial #S# is a dive to build speed, then you loop or roll ad libitum, and an ace can simply do it without #S# because he knows how to "stretch" his mount (or her flight envelope, if you wish) a little better.

After all, it is coeherent.

And talking about realism, please notice that I said: "As far as we can talk of realism in Blue Max".






Enter the reply

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

23years 53days gugliandalf Re: against new restricted's rules
 23years 52days gugliandalf Re: against new restricted's rules
  23years 52days Zif Re: against new restricted's rules
  23years 52days Kollos71 Re: against new restricted's rules
   23years 52days Zif Re: against new restricted's rules
   23years 52days Kollos71 Re: against new restricted's rules
   23years 52days Monkey Hanger Re: against new restricted's rules
   23years 52days Falconfab Re: against new restricted's rules
   23years 51days Zif Re: against new restricted's rules
   23years 51days arktos Re: against new restricted's rules
   23years 50days gugliandalf Re: against new restricted's rules
23years 53days PaoloL Re: against new restricted's rules
23years 52days Crash and Burn Re: against new restricted's rules
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

23years 50days Swartz Game replay
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

23years 53days gugliandalf Apologies...
23years 52days gugliandalf Re: Apologies...
 23years 52days Zif Re: Apologies...
  23years 50days gugliandalf Re: Apologies...
23years 53days Monkey Hanger Re: Apologies...
 23years 52days gugliandalf Re: Apologies...
Page generated in: 21.19141 milliseconds.