LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Evanston, IL USA WA
Personal Data:Male, born: July 17 1944
Membership21years 67days ago.
Last Login14years 116days ago.
Last Move14years 155days ago.
Bombadil is currently Offline!Send a mail to Bombadil


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Program code error
Subject:Re: why not "retire with honour" ?
Posted by: Bombadil - 20years 48days ago.
Message text
Ashtar wrote:
My friends, this is a boardgame , not a wargame, and a very succesfull boardgame to be fair. (Bombadil-?A boardgame, you mean like Monopoly or Chutes & Ladders? I usually describe it to the unknowing as "Chess with machine guns". I have to disagree there with your point.

It has been designed to roughly simulate two enemy patrols having a chance encounter in no men lands. Point. No missions for instance, for that you should at least modify fuel ratings. But it's very funny and it works very well. Bombadil-I totally agree that the game system works very well!

Moreover, in the original boardgame you will not find any trace of the point system used on this site, which has been adapted from some unofficial scoring system used for many players combat in some tornaments. Bombadil-Totally disagree! The scoring of 1 point/turn and 25 points /kill is taken directly from the original rules on Page seven under "Campaign Rules"/"Experience".

Therefore you should note that:

a) The scoring system is not well suited for 1vs.1 matches. To be honest Blue Max too was not designed for 1vs.1 which indeed are pretty boring.Bombadil-I would disagree about 1-on-1 games being 'boring'. I'll give you they are low scoring but in them one's ability to out maneuver an opponent is paramount to success. Often the couple of hits one inflicts determine the victor often result from you being clever or him screwing up.

b) The only reasonable index of your personal success (as in WW1) should be the kills you score and the general behavior of your squad. Count these, do not bother about losing or winning by points. Bombadil-I have no issue here. Change the original rules and I'll still play the new way.

c) The "retire with honour" concept has been introduced for tournament reasons and to remind people that according to the rules you should try to exit from your side and not from the opposite one. But I suspect the name is a bit unfortunate, since many people seems to have too strong feelings whenever the word "honour" comes into play . Bombadil-Agreed, "Honour" stirs the emotions. However, I think the intent of these parameters in the tournaments has been more to not have people running off and weakening their team for relatively bogus reasons

Have fun and see you in the sky


I really hope my comments will not be taken as being confrontational, (see above after most of "Ashtar's comments) I don't mean them to be!!
Something each of us, myself included, need to keep in mind is that we have here a (good) game being played by 1000+ people and everyone comes to it with slightly different expectations and approaches.

Bombadil

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

20years 53days SkunkGuru [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
20years 53days SkunkGuru Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
20years 53days HeadMMoid Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
20years 53days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
20years 53days flying_neko Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
 20years 53days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
  20years 53days flying_neko Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
20years 52days SkunkGuru Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
 20years 50days HeadMMoid Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
  20years 50days sven3012 Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
   20years 49days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
    20years 49days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
     20years 49days HeadMMoid Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
      20years 49days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
       20years 49days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
        20years 49days Ashtar Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
         20years 49days warrax Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
         20years 48days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
          20years 44days HeadMMoid Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
20years 52days wetty11 Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
20years 49days Tornade Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
 20years 49days HeadMMoid Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
  20years 49days Tornade Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
   20years 49days darken Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
   20years 44days HeadMMoid Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
20years 48days Nick Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
20years 48days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
19years 308days Nick Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
 19years 307days kduke Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
  19years 307days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
  19years 307days Wertzz Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
   19years 307days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
    19years 307days moonglum01 Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
     19years 307days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 307days kduke [BM][OT] Supporting "You Play It"
19years 307days Der_Kobra Re: [BM][OT] Supporting "You Play It"
19years 307days bear23 Re: [BM][OT] Supporting "You Play It"
19years 307days BaluMG Re: [BM][OT] Supporting "You Play It"
19years 306days imdog Re: [BM][OT] Supporting "You Play It"
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 307days Rahab [BM][OT] On vacation
Page generated in: 17.96875 milliseconds.