LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Osaka JP
Personal Data:Male,
Membership16years 221days ago.
Last Login1day 15h ago.
Last Move4days 10h ago.
markrendl is currently Offline!Send a mail to markrendl


Message header
Area/Game:General
Topic:General
Subject:Re: blue max ethic
Posted by: markrendl - 11years 344days ago.
Message text
ecz67 wrote:
hello to everyone!

I'm a newbie playing here from a couple of weeks and with less than 10 games under my belt.

first of all congrats for this wonderful site where is easy arrange a fight with people very experienced and able to show you the hard way how Blue Max should be played.

That said I have a question about the ethic of who propose to play a scenario strongly unbalanced.

why one should create a game unbalanced AND pick the best side? I can imagine that a very experienced player asking for a challange, picks the less favourite side, but I see very often in the scenarios 1/1 ready to be joined only the weak plane is still available.

there are many well balanced scenarios at disposal, I understand one could still decide to play something unbalanced for fun and challenge, but what's the point to take "always" the strong side?
Am I missing something? thanks


When I create 1 vs 1 games, I do them in pairs, playing one of each side. Of course, some folks simply sign up for one game and I end up playing two different opponents. Multiple plane games, can be done the same way.

People who post unbalanced 1 vs. 1 scenarios and take the stronger side, run the risk of the game not getting filled and getting deleted. Though sometimes, a newbie will sign up or a more experienced pilot looking for a challenge may give it a try.

markrendl

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

11years 344days ecz67 blue max ethic
11years 344days bltzlfsk Re: blue max ethic
11years 344days imdog Re: blue max ethic
11years 344days markrendl Re: blue max ethic
11years 343days Christie Re: blue max ethic
11years 343days ecz67 Re: blue max ethic
 11years 343days Christie Re: blue max ethic
  11years 342days pokerguy Re: blue max ethic
11years 342days BlackSheep Re: blue max ethic
11years 342days wetty11 Re: blue max ethic
11years 335days DBurkeG Re: blue max ethic
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

11years 336days DBurkeG [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
11years 336days DBurkeG Re: [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
 11years 336days dcr66 Re: [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
  11years 333days dirtyed84 Re: [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

11years 342days markrendl [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
11years 341days imdog Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
11years 340days wetty11 Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
 11years 340days markrendl Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
  11years 340days wetty11 Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
Page generated in: 29.58984 milliseconds.