How come a Tripe is considered as good as a Pfaltz DIIIa???
and a fokker Dr.I as good as an Albatros???
I suggest a fine-tuning:
50% for the moves the fighter has:
------------------------
15% for being speed 3
20% for the 180deg moves
15% for the 120deg moves
25% for the offensive factor:
------------------------
17% for the number of guns
8% for the stability
25% for the defensive factor:
------------------------
15% for tail and engine
10% for fuselage and wings
then let us know if the points look more reasonable 
just my 2 EuroCents
gugliandalf wrote:
An idea that keeps popping every now and then, is to give different scores for killing different planes.
I made a simple XLS and that's the result:
Plane = Score
Sopwith Snipe = 34
S.S. D.III/D.IV = 32
Fokker D. VII = 30
Bristol F.2B = 28
S.E.5a = 27
Pfalz D. IIIa = 25
Sopwith Tripe = 25
Halberstadt CL = 25
Spad XIII = 25
Albatros D.Va = 25
Pfalz D. XII = 24
Nieuport 28 = 23
Albatros D.III = 23
Fokker Dr. I = 23
Spad VII = 23
Sopwith Camel = 22
Nieuport 17 = 18
S.S. D.I = 18
Just a couple words about it.
I computed EWFT, fuel, guns, stability, number of 120° moves, number of 180° moves and speed (2 or 3 hexes), divided every factor by the average of all models and gave the result a 10% weight.
Again divided total by average totals and multiplied by 25.
It seems quite fair to me, waddaya think about it? |
Donate
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
