LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Mahomet, Il. US
Personal Data:Male, born: August 15 1948
Membership22years 339days ago.
Last Login7years 208days ago.
Last Move12years 203days ago.
Phil Hall is currently Offline!Send a mail to Phil Hall


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Rules
Subject:Re: Crtitcal hits
Posted by: Phil Hall - 21years 51days ago.
Message text

I think the question was meant to be "If air craft A and B is going head-to-head and shooting at each other, but A is higher than B, then who gets the advantage?"

Logically, the situation would cancel out all altitude modifiers (A and B are going straight towards each other!).

I think a range reduction is the wrong way to go, btw. Make it a straight bonus instead (+2 at all ranges?). I mean, You shouldn't be able to shoot farther because the target is larger!


Aha! My brain wasn't running in that direction. Didn't think of the headon pass. Now I have to make a fiddly rule. IF two a/c at different altitudes fire their forward guns at each other, neither recieves the height advantage. On the next turn the higher a/c must lose altitude, and the lower a/c must gain altitude.

Now why I did the range reduction instead of a modifier. The range in hexes don't really represent range. They represent increasing and decreasing target size as you get closer or further from the target. When you get above or below an aircraft you can see more of it, but you also create deflection since you are now out of the plane of movement of the target. Actually you would see more of the enemy from and angle that depends on the stagger of his wings and the size of them, instead of directly overhead or from directly below.

Next headache will be how to handle the 2 seater blind spot. Thinking on that one.

By the way, I'm answering this just before I have to leave for a meeting with a friend. Couldn't be as longwinded as usual. Lucky you are my friends.

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

21years 60days Impailer [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
21years 60days warrax Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
21years 60days Impailer Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
 21years 54days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
  21years 54days imdog Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
  21years 53days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
  21years 54days Impailer Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
  21years 53days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 53days Impailer Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    21years 53days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
  21years 54days Impailer Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 54days imdog Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    21years 53days Impailer Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
21years 60days Bramley Bomber Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
 21years 54days kduke Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
  21years 53days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 53days Sackman_Dan Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 53days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 53days flying_neko Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 53days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 53days Hans Johansohn Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 53days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    21years 53days Hans Johansohn Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    21years 53days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    21years 53days Hans Johansohn Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 53days imdog Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 53days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    21years 53days imdog Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    21years 53days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    21years 53days Troll Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
     21years 53days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
       21years 53days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
        21years 53days Troll Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
         21years 53days dakadave Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
        21years 12days castiglione Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 52days flying_neko Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 52days imdog Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 52days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    21years 52days flying_neko Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
     21years 52days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
      21years 52days Sabelkatten Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
       21years 51days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
        21years 51days Sabelkatten Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
         21years 51days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
          21years 46days kduke Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   21years 12days castiglione Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    21years 11days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    21years 11days Crash and Burn Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    21years 11days Ashtar Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
     21years 11days Crash and Burn Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
     21years 11days castiglione Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

21years 11days Crash and Burn [BM] error with the SPAD 13 & 7, number of tail boxes
21years 11days kduke Re: [BM] error with the SPAD 13 & 7, number of tail boxes
 21years 10days Crash and Burn Re: [BM] error with the SPAD 13 & 7, number of tail boxes
  21years 10days kduke Re: [BM] error with the SPAD 13 & 7, number of tail boxes
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

21years 12days Steadman [OT] Why not move WSIM already?
21years 12days flying_neko Re: [OT] Why not move WSIM already?
21years 11days Steadman Re: [OT] Why not move WSIM already?
 21years 11days flying_neko Re: [OT] Why not move WSIM already?
21years 11days Nick Re: [OT] Why not move WSIM already?
Page generated in: 20.3125 milliseconds.