LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


> Not a member yet?
> Forgot your password?
Main menu
Preferred site
Take a play
Forum Message
Country:US
Membership19years 359days ago.
Last Login18years 245days ago.
Last Move18years 249days ago.
ChiggyVonR is currently Offline!Send a mail to ChiggyVonR

Message header
Area/Game:Wooden Ships & Iron Men
1Topic:How to play
Subject:[WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
Posted by: ChiggyVonR - 19years 237days ago.
Message text
I know this is going to get the purists off their seats but I was curious if others feel that the game is modeling this era correctly?

To me the rake tables are just off when it comes to rigging. You see if you turn the ship either way you will hit sails when you are raking the ship, however was that damage that great? I mean you punch a hole in the cloth, big deal.

To me the rake did more damage to the hull since your shot had a better chance of hitting the ship if your range was off. meaning the length of the ship was easily hit as opposed to having to be on target for a depth of what 20 feet you are hitting at a depth of 50+. Now I don't recall the specs of the sizes of ships nor am I going to go look them up.

But rakes, especially at longer range should do more hull and crew damage then rigging.

In other words, it may be true to form for the original game, but I think the original game got it wrong!

Yeah I know the beams would be more exposed, but considering they were dead eying the shot, the length of the target area, because of the variance in powder strength would be the bigger issue, and the spares of the sails would really be more exposed when side by side then raking because the spares would be raked so to speak when battle lines were beside each other.

So how would I change it? Maybe allow the target to be hull when it is being raked. Again the hull would take the major damage, the sails I think would hold up under the attacks much better then the surface of the hull as the shot drops in and kills crew and blows open the deck and perhaps damages the guns.

So I ask, is raking a ship modeled correctly?
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 237days ChiggyVonR [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
19years 237days ChiggyVonR Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
19years 237days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
19years 237days michzeidler Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
 19years 236days sfatula Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  19years 236days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  19years 235days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  19years 235days pbass111 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
   19years 235days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
   19years 234days HHornblower Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
    19years 234days pbass111 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
19years 235days southernskies Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
 19years 234days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  19years 234days southernskies Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  19years 234days Silver Sunchild Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
   19years 233days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
    19years 230days Silver Sunchild Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  19years 233days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
   19years 231days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
    19years 231days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
     19years 1day jesmith29 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
      19years 1day HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
       19years 1day sfatula Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
Page generated in: 16.01563 milliseconds.