ChiggyVonR wrote:
[
Typical, I guess you are only going to quote one side and I think we could find a few games about you the same way if I wanted to play the propaganda game!
Typical? Yes, it's called HONEST. The games I qouted were the ONLY ones with your name on them in the last 100 games list, I left out not one. So, of course, it COULD be that are not typical I suppose. Just going off the data.
I think you would find my opponents don't have a handful of games. But, that's what you want, right? I can't stop someone from joining a game of mine of course, so, there might be one somewhere. But no, you will NOT find I have games against newbies, so, I suppose you are complaining about someone else.
There is no propaganda in facts, though stats can distort things I suppose. The facts are:
1. You play against newbies regularly (at least of the last 100 games shown)
2. You talk about points more than anyone else on any of the forums, no one else seems to care about points as they are meaningless except to determine a winner, even then, not always accurate
3. You have a line of people mad at you, so, I would take a step back and rethink what you are saying, but MOST importantly, the solution:
4. You can prevent ALL of this by simply stating when you make a game "no experienced players". If someone experienced still joins, I would agree with you (yes, I really would agree!) that you have a valid complaint. I think the intentions of the person who makes a game should be respected. At that point, air it out in the forums!
So, please implement #4 so that all people are clear who you do, or do not wait to play against. It's really that simple. I think you will find things a lot less stressful. For me, I will not join games against you, you have made that very clear! |
